Blue Fisher
Well-known member
In a few of the threads there have been opinions raised over using the simple rings on cork handles. Some say they never fail, others won’t use them and a few use them augmented with tape to be sure. Others advocate the use of the John Roberts product.
Well on one of my recent old rod purchases I have another product, Fuji FRS 27, Pic below. The 27 is the required diameter of the cork.
They work like simple rings but you can twist lock them when in place, probably on some sort of flexible cone arrangement. They seem like a really good idea, Your hand is partially on your nice warm expensive cork, the reel is securely held and they can be positioned anywhere on the butt. I would prefer this arrangement over the commonly used fixed DPS type screw fittings. There your hand is on the plastic fitting, sometimes on the threaded bit and away from your lovely comfy cork. Also the fitting is in a fixed position ( not often a real problem I admit but the FRS 27 option allows freedom of choice.)
So why aren’t these fittings more common? I can see they are no longer in the Fuji catalogue, but a dealer in the Netherlands may have some old stock. Did Fuji decide not to sell a cheap effective and flexible product where they could sell many other types of reel seat instead. Or was the FRS 27 fundamentally flawed and withdrawn?
Well on one of my recent old rod purchases I have another product, Fuji FRS 27, Pic below. The 27 is the required diameter of the cork.
They work like simple rings but you can twist lock them when in place, probably on some sort of flexible cone arrangement. They seem like a really good idea, Your hand is partially on your nice warm expensive cork, the reel is securely held and they can be positioned anywhere on the butt. I would prefer this arrangement over the commonly used fixed DPS type screw fittings. There your hand is on the plastic fitting, sometimes on the threaded bit and away from your lovely comfy cork. Also the fitting is in a fixed position ( not often a real problem I admit but the FRS 27 option allows freedom of choice.)
So why aren’t these fittings more common? I can see they are no longer in the Fuji catalogue, but a dealer in the Netherlands may have some old stock. Did Fuji decide not to sell a cheap effective and flexible product where they could sell many other types of reel seat instead. Or was the FRS 27 fundamentally flawed and withdrawn?