I don't think that there is much "probably" about it personally.It's called passing the buck.
The current government, most probably won't be in power in 2011, so they can now pass the responsibility over to what will be the new Government, hense washing their filthy smeared hands of any responsibility.
It's another example of a weak minded dithering spineless jellyfish leadership.
Brown and all his Labourite gobshites will be trying their best to feather their nests for when they all get kicked out of office next year.I don't think that there is much "probably" about it personally.
If you follow some of the actions of this government then you will see that an awful lot of legislation has been 'postponed' until after the late date of the next election, and yet this reaks of another Government 'class warfare' decision just like the Fox Hunting Bill.
It is nice though to see the Angling Trust taking a firm and timely statement on this topic.
Wouldn't be so sure Peter, Cameron needs to achieve a landslide equivalent to either Attlee in 1945 or Blair in 1997 to achieve an overall majority of 1! Generally the results are a little closer than polls suggest (not huge differences but just a little). In terms of an overall majority "just a little" narrowing would be fatal for Cameron in seeking a clear mandate. I think you are correct in the assumption that it is highly unlikely the current Prime Minister will be in office after the General Election. I am not sure, however, that his opponent will achieve the post he desires this time around.I don't think that there is much "probably" about it personally.
Remember Mistresses Maid's Work Permit anyone?Rememeber cash for questions anyone?
Blimey PJ it's blooming hard balancing on the tightrope of impartiality...I do my best!However, we are straying into the land of "politics" but then this article could never be fully discussed without that, I suppose.