bennygesserit
Well-known member
Re: Martin Gay's Historic Carp Captures - THIS is 'Overwhelming Evidence'...
Eddie have you told Cliff where the water is ?
Eddie have you told Cliff where the water is ?
Eddie have you told Cliff where the water is ?
Hi Philip..........You are quite correct I did say that I believe that I know where the water is. However, you appear to have overlooked my blog number 721 dated 20.12.2015 part of which follows.
Finally, Crow, you finish by saying that there is a post on this thread that needs some consideration....'that Eddie has NO IDEA where this secret venue might be situated'.
Well NOW I do have some idea where.
Eddie you appear to now be doing this on purpose. Your attempting yet again to bring the discussion back to Lennox power and thus PS & the CS. I told you Eddie..Lake Onatrio is over 19000 km2 Martin Gay could have caught his Carp anywhere on that lake, or Canada or indeed anywhere on planet earth. You are insulting peoples intelligence and attempting to MANIPULATE THIS DISCUSSION AND MISLEAD PEOPLE for your ulterior motives.Terry Brady, the Environmental Advisor stated "I can't imagine that kayaks have ever been leaning against our fence at the outfall channel. In the 18 years I've been working here I have never seen anyone kayaking here. The water is just too big, and usually rough. I see the lake all day because my office overlooks it".
Still, what would he know, he's only worked there for 18 years.
Cliff Hatton
To Paul Selman: as I've said repeatedly just recently, if Martin was staying under the same roof as his relatives for two and a half weeks and had been witnessed returning home 'white and visibly shaking' after seeing some big fish, JamesN should be able to report that Martin's nephew, Nate, ALSO saw his uncle come home beaming with joy after catching some of those big fish: you can't have one without the other.
POPPYCOCK HATTON!
This is what his family said to James N: My neighbour (Nate) told me that he remembered his uncle walking into the house after the walk and he was white and visibly shaken stating he had just seen lots and lots of massive carp, nothing like he had ever seen before. He immediately went to the local hardware store and bought some tackle and went fishing for them. He spent the rest of the holiday there and caught lots of big fish.
As usual, you read what you want to read Cliff/or is it Nobby?
This is my last post here on this subject. It is a complete waste of time trying to correct a fake distortion of carp fishing history led by two bigoted individuals who have introduced no new real evidence whatsoever.
The only historic aspect of Martin's Gays catch is that it was the first time a known angler tried to hoodwink the angling public via the angling press into believing a catch from abroad had been achieved in the UK.
Why don't the pedants and non believers get over the fact that despite the lack of irrefutable, concrete evidence the balance of information indicates the fish were indeed caught in the UK. Is this the high court all of a sudden?
Here's a concept, why don't Philip, Paul1, Ray et al provide proof,concrete evidence etc that these captures were made overseas? If you're so sure then put up your information instead of smearing two more posters on this subject.
Selman, here's a friendly tip, when in a hole stop digging. You've embarrassed yourself with your about face contradictions and need to sit back and reflect on your input here.
Or should I just write "censored off' as is permitted on FW forum?
Here's a concept, why don't Philip, Paul1, Ray et al provide proof,concrete evidence etc that these captures were made overseas?
Philip: Eddie cannot be expected to remember precisely what was what said about the photos' fate; he only knows they have been 'disposed of' and that we ain't gonna see them again unless a serendipitous finger points us in the right direction. This is not likely, and to hang your hopes on them turning up is unrealistic. Please accept that they're gone.
Please also accept that neither Eddie nor myself can confirm canoes or kayaks in the pic's.
Your posts continue to add nothing of any interest or significance to this debate and this has been the case for a very long time now. Please can you reply with some kind of assurance that your future posts will focus on something different - something interesting, significant, pertinent, fresh....something less repetitive? Thank you, Philip.
You might as well ask for pictures of the tooth fairy
4) Eddie in the interests of trying to move this on…one thing you mention that interests me greatly is this…
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddiebenham
Anyway, I did manage to track down some other unedited photos, which are nothing like the edited ones, for you to look at didn't I. Try stacking kayaks, canoes or anything else for that matter behind that fence.
Forgive me but its my Spanish inquisition need for details again.... I am confused….which photos are you now talking about ? ….you mention the fence as well ….are you saying that you have some photos of the actual chain link fence that was in the unedited photos ? ….perhaps not with Martin or the Carp or the Kayaks or anything else….But do you have some photos of the actual chain link fence that was in the unedited photos ?
Please give a clear answer to this point if you can. Thanks.
The tooth fairy is a mythical non existent figure...........
Because they're not present and, are extremely unlikely to appear for reasons oft stated. That's how it is. Get over it. What exactly are you trying to prove? Re-correction, you are pedantic. Sorry.
I hope my g/daughter isn't reading this.