So there's a rod on the market with Barbel and 3lb on the butt? I don't want want one, but it doesn't bother me if some do. The phrase "barbel fishing" suggests it's always much the same thing, but in reality the conditions and demands can be worlds apart. I fished for barbel through the summer, and caught them on: an old but classy 13' float rod; a pellet waggler rod; an Avon rod; a 1.75 lb barbel rod; a 2lb + barbel rod labelled Snag and Flood, and a 10' 2.75 lb rod for places where the snags overhead are as bad as the ones in the water. I love it when you can fish "pretty" with the more lightweight gear, but, the gear has to match the demands and one size does not fit all. For just one example, in swims where the barbel live amongst and just past the rocks shoring up the bank, a rod that bends a lot, say a 12' 1.75 Torrix, generally a pleasure to use with its flexible top section, can become a liability, as it keeps bending as you try to stop the fishes first bolt, and this gives the fish the small margin it needs to pull your line across the rocks and snags and cut you off. The Chimera Snag and Flood, clue in the name, stops that happening much more effectively.
Just as I was looking at this thread, I noticed social media stuff from a group of anglers who fish a complex on the lower middle Trent that has a clutch of big pits and a prolific stretch of river. The posts show anglers have been fishing overnight for barbel, with the exception of a day or two at the height of the floods, throughout this long period of high water. The conditions are something else. An angler asks if his 5 oz leads will be ok, and gets answers that 10oz won't hold in some swims, but 8oz should do. There is no chance I'll ever go in for anything like this, but I'm not about to try and tell them what rods they should be using. It's an angling niche, and the 3lb Barbel Rod a niche product the vast majority can just ignore.
The debate around what gear barbel anglers should use comes around regularly