D
Davy North
Guest
After the flack Mr Bailey took for his article in last months Coarse Fisherman, by some of the biggest names in the sport, I'm suprised to see him at it again this month.
I'm not against people speaking their minds, and for a long time gave John the bebefit of the doubt, after all he must have put as many hours in watching fish as anyone. However having seen him quoted more than once on anti's web sites I can't help thinking he sould maybe keep his opinions to himself, because after all that is just what they are opinions.
I'm not going into the arguments they've been covered here before, but I do wonder if John thinks so much harm, and even psycological harm can be done to fish, how does he justify his own fishing? Or maybe he thinks he's the only person clever enough not to harm fish.
As I said, I'm not against people speaking their minds, but at the moment John's comments could do a lot more harm than good.
What do other people think?
I'm not against people speaking their minds, and for a long time gave John the bebefit of the doubt, after all he must have put as many hours in watching fish as anyone. However having seen him quoted more than once on anti's web sites I can't help thinking he sould maybe keep his opinions to himself, because after all that is just what they are opinions.
I'm not going into the arguments they've been covered here before, but I do wonder if John thinks so much harm, and even psycological harm can be done to fish, how does he justify his own fishing? Or maybe he thinks he's the only person clever enough not to harm fish.
As I said, I'm not against people speaking their minds, but at the moment John's comments could do a lot more harm than good.
What do other people think?