It?s almost time that this thread was brought to a close. Accusations have been made and the thread has been left open until now to give Sedge an opportunity to change his mind and further answer his critics.
Unfortunately, in spite of many pleading with him to change his mind about withdrawing from any interaction with FM?s members through the forum, he has decided to remain detached from it. This is a pity, because he often had many interesting, witty and wise contributions to make.
It is mainly unfortunate, however, because it is a victory for the anonymous, the faceless ones that inhabit forums to spread their poisonous insinuations and accusations from behind an assumed name.
I?m not speaking out of turn here, because what I?m about to say I?ve already said to Sedge in personal emails. I think he is wrong, very wrong, to run away from this issue. If all angling writers decided to ignore their critics in letter?s pages or forums and remain aloof there would be little point in the magazine or website providing the means for readers to question and discuss what they?ve read.
Fair enough, reply to a critic, and then ignore any further criticism if one feels the first reply was adequate, but to withdraw completely from the forum is NOT the answer. In this instance it is merely handing victory to those who abuse the medium.
I can understand him wanting to withdraw from any further discussion with ?Dove Bailiff?, but I cannot understand why that should include withdrawing from any further discussion with all the good people who inhabit this forum, who don?t deserve to be ignored, especially since he obviously has so many fans fighting his corner for him.
It?s wrong; I?ve told him I think it?s wrong, and I want everyone to know my view on this issue, hence this post.
Before closing, let me say that I?m not sure what ?Dove Bailiff? is getting at with his ?photo doctoring? comment, but let me assure everyone that none of the photos that Sedge has submitted have been doctored, other than to delete backgrounds where necessary so as to comply with the publicity ban that the ruling club enforces.
I'll allow further comments on this issue, particularly the points I've just raised, but not from 'Dove Bailiff'. If he has further comments to make he should use his real name, otherwise they will be deleted.