What if EE's don't want to integrate or are just simply happy to continue emptying waters of fish?
What
compulsion does anyone have now to integrate?
Without the connotations that can be given/offered to promoting deportation, for the sake of putting emotions aside and just sticking to the facts only.....
How do we propose we can stop theft without first having a law that gives guidance to it being wrong? Without the law on theft, theft becomes ok and grows within a society.
Everyone should benefit from the fruits of the Law (me, you not even excluding the thief & rapist) which is why when someone comes to your house you want to invite them in and share stuff. (keep your hands off the oatcakes though....they are mine
)
IE guidence, protection and to go all out on it....if you want all that for yourself or for others and for everyone in the future.....what good enough reason do we have for not giving what is good for everyone, withholding something that is good promotes bad things, like in the absence of heat things go cold.
My dad was (and always will be) the man of the house, he provided everything I needed, he set the house rules, he dished out the punishments when guidance was needed, I quickly learned that the rules were for my own good, they made perfect sense, when they didn't, mature wisdom was offered and learned but never had to come by persuasion, because it was self evident.
I learned that when I adhered to these rules, they allowed me to have a much better relationship with the master of the house AND I always avoided being punished as a bonus, wow who would argue AGAINST getting along smoothly AND no punishments? I would call that a RESULT!
So using the same analogy to describe the situation with the EE thing, daddy cannot dish out punishments anymore because its no longer considered guidance, but might even be taught, construed, extrapolated and educationally accepted to be as perverse by definition as abuse, even going as far as inviting outside intervention from imposter rule makers in the mans house.
Currently the boundary between guidance, protection & abuse is becoming blurred. Make no mistake. We are all now in the present, asking why is this even happening?
I don't like him, he smokes spliffs, or he is a dirty Ra.a...a..a ed while I support Blue etc, now throw into the mix a couple of medieval feudalistic religions that cannot be compromised with, a few hundred different language barriers, a massive bureaucratic brick wall between wageslave and his sticky Representative, a country of people who have worked tirelessly for generations to build things that were after all meant to be enjoyed well into the future as show of love FOR the future.
So using the same analogy again, if son has a friend stop over, the house rules still apply, or do they?
Are they up for consideration or debate?
What does daddy do, after grafting all day, comes home and finds the friend of his son who is in his house, is caught red handed taking his four pack of lager out of the fridge, which is daddy's as he worked hard for it and is thirsty?
Has son's friend been in the house long enough to make new rules allowing him to take Beer he hasn't worked to pay for?
If you answered yes then why bother having rules then?
If we cannot be bothered to maintain laws that serve EVERYONE, or have decided a step back in time is a step forward in prosperity, how can daddy claim he deserves his fourth can of lager while his sons friend casually sips that nice gassy cold thirst quenching liquid?
Snooze, you lose.
---------- Post added at 11:42 ---------- Previous post was at 11:32 ----------
If the UK chooses to come out of the EU then the position of whether they could stay or not would have to be addressed.
Who voted for a foreign power in a British voting/polling booth nicepix?
Are the laws for treason still applicable in the UK? Just an after thought.
