John Aston
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2007
- Messages
- 930
- Reaction score
- 2,355
It is nothing to with 'putting fishing before a virus', but a sensible way of balancing personal liberty with our duty to others . The Trust has merely clarified that , as part of permitted exercise , people may choose to fish . It's not an instruction , but a concession , and there really is no need to be abusive to others about the clarification the government has made - not the Trust , incidentally , who do not have the power to make the rules.
Obviously , for many reasons , some anglers may elect not to exercise the choice they now have , and we should respect their decision , as they should respect my intention to carry out a lawful activity . For some of us fortunate enough to be near a water, it is a welcome consent to do something that , with forethought and common sense , presents no risk whatsoever to the angler or to others. In my case, the practical effect will be that I will hardly see a soul , if anyone , unlike the reasonable number one encounters on local walks.
Several fellow anglers are essential workers , whose work I admire and respect , and I am sure they will especially welcome the break.
Obviously , for many reasons , some anglers may elect not to exercise the choice they now have , and we should respect their decision , as they should respect my intention to carry out a lawful activity . For some of us fortunate enough to be near a water, it is a welcome consent to do something that , with forethought and common sense , presents no risk whatsoever to the angler or to others. In my case, the practical effect will be that I will hardly see a soul , if anyone , unlike the reasonable number one encounters on local walks.
Several fellow anglers are essential workers , whose work I admire and respect , and I am sure they will especially welcome the break.